Education Resources

April 21, 2006

Youth mentoring

Filed under: Education — @ 8:55 am

Youth mentoring

Youth mentoring is the process of matching caring, concerned adults with young people who may be at risk. The adult is usually unrelated and works as a volunteer through a community, school or church based social service program.

A more formal definition of youth mentoring is provided by the website InFed:

“The classic definition of mentoring is of an older experienced guide who is acceptable to the young person and who can help ease the transition to adulthood by a mix of support and challenge. In this sense it is a developmental relationship in which the young person is inducted into the world of adulthood (Hamilton, 1991; Freedman, 1995).”

Contents

History

Many people have “natural mentors” as they grow up and transition into adulthood. These people might be aunts or uncles, grandparents, neighbors, teachers, pastors, coaches or family friends. These relationships are valuable to young people in many ways.

However, many young people do not have these natural mentors (for a variety of reasons).

So, social service programs have developed to fill this gap. These social service programs are of many varieties. Some developed from faith communities. Others are funded by government programs. Still others are community based without any formal affiliations. But they all share the common goal of strengthening our communities by providing mentors for young people.

Benefits of Youth Mentoring

Intuitively we know youth mentoring is good for young people. However, many studies have provided evidence that youth mentoring has many positive outcomes for young people, adults and their communities.

According to the National Mentoring Partnership, youth mentoring helps produce benefits such as:

  • young people tend to stay in school
  • young people tend to get better grades
  • young people improve their self-esteem
  • young people are less likely to start using drugs or alcohol
  • young people learn to get along better with others

Most youth mentoring programs have many success stories and feedback from their participants.

Here are some examples:

“I have the great luxury of knowing my son is having a good time and in good hands when he is with (his mentor). My son’s mentor played a major part in turning his life around. His experiences with his mentor have been completely positive ones. I could never thank them enough for the time they’ve spent and the influence they have had on my son’s life.”

-Cheryl (parent)

“A happy healthy daughter makes me a happier, healthier mom. I continue to inform people about this great program.”

-Susan (parent)

“She’s nice, she’s funny, we cook together…I wish (my mentor) could be in my life forever.”

-Amber (child)

“I have learned how to have fun with adults.”

-Leiha (child)

(The above examples are from the Kinship mentoring program)

Youth Mentoring Supporters

Volunteers from many backgrounds have long been the backbone on youth mentoring programs. In recent years however, many high level elected officials have gotten involved to help promote youth mentoring.

President George W. Bush and First Lady Laura Bush have been two important supporters of youth mentoring.

“…If you want to serve America, become a mentor.”

-President George W. Bush

Click here for article.

Other notable elected officials include Florida Governor Jeb Bush who mentored a child on a weekly basis for over six years.

“Governor’s Mentoring Initiative Bringing Results for Florida’s Students”

Click here for article.

Also, the governors of California, Arizona, North Carolina and Texas have all established initiatives to help support and promote youth mentoring.

Arizona

California

North Carolina

Texas

National Youth Mentoring Organizations

These are some larger organizations actively involved in youth mentoring in the USA:

Kinship, Inc.

Big Brothers Big Sisters of America

Youth Mentoring Resources

These organizations provide information, training, awareness and advocacy for youth mentoring:

MENTOR/National Mentoring Partnership

Mentoring Partnership of Minnesota

Web-based training

Filed under: Education — @ 8:55 am

Web-based training

Web-based training (WBT) is a type of training that is similar to computer-based training (CBT); however, it is delivered over the Internet using a web browser. Web-based training frequently includes interactive methods, such as bulletin boards, chat rooms, instant messaging, videoconferencing, and discussion threads. WBT is usually a self-paced learning medium, however some systems allow for online testing and evaluation at specific times.

See also

  • videobooks
  • online training
  • computer based training
  • e-learning
  • distance learning

Youth voice

Filed under: Education — @ 8:55 am

Youth voice

Youth voice is a fairly common neologism to refers to the distinct ideas, opinions, attitudes, knowledge, and actions of young people as a collective body.

Contents

Background

The term youth voice is often intended to group together a diversity of perspectives and experiences, regardless of backgrounds, identities, and cultural differences. Alternately, the plural forms of either word are usually intended to recognize plurality and diversity of experience, as in youths voice or youth voices. The concept is traditionally acknowledged by community and classroom educators and youth workers; it is increasingly employed by politicians, researchers, and mainstream media.

Student voice is an increasingly common neologism that encapsulates the spirit of youth voice in the context of schools. Whether expressed in the course of learning, the process of decision-making, or the passion of self-advocacy, student voice acknowledges the unique position of the learner as an informed contributor in teaching, learning, and leadership throughout education.

The history of youth voice extends at least to the Middle Ages, when as a youth of 14 Joan of Arc led armies into battle. Other sources cite[citation needed] the historic examples of young lamas in Buddism, such as the current Dalai Lama who was only 6 when he was identified as the next spiritual and political leader of Tibet; or Jesus Christ, who according to Christian tradition was just 12 when he began his effort to educate his community about his spiritual beliefs.

In modern times, youth activism, which is reliant upon youth voice, began in the United States in the late 1800s. The US has seen continuous interest (although not sustained) in youth voice since that time, with particular upsurges in the 1930s (American Youth Congress), the 1960s (SDS, SNCC, Youth Liberation of Ann Arbor) through to the early 1970s (National Commission on Resources for Youth). In the 1950s and 60s sociologist Margaret Mead actively promoted deepened understanding and engagement of youth voice.

Recently, a growing number of nonprofit, educational, and governmental programs around the world claim to advocate and/or engage youth voice in a variety of ways. They include YouthBuild USA, National Youth Rights Association, and youth councils around the world. The United Nations has heavily proponented youth voice through its Youth Unit, as well as the Convention on the Rights of the Child in Articles 5 and 12. A number of academics, authors, and advocates also proponent youth voice, including cultural critic Henry Giroux, activist/author William Upski Wimsatt, critical pedagogue Peter McLaren, and anti-racist/feminist/anti-imperialist theorist bell hooks.

Applications

Youth voice has many applications, as mentioned above. In communities, youth voice is acknowledged through youth service community youth development, Youth activism, and Youth councils; in schools, youth voice is heard in service learning, democratic schooling methods, and student activism. Other methods for acknowledging youth voice include engaging young people in city planning, program evaluation, community organizing, government advisory boards, nonprofit leadership, news reporting, and paticipatory action research.

Criticism

There are numerous detractors to both the concept of youth voice and the practice of gathering, invoking, extolling, or otherwise hearing youth voice. Perspectives range from what some call the inherent noblesse oblige involved: that is, listening to youth voice involves adults feeling “humble” enough to “stoop” to the level of youth. There are also a number of concerns regarding the diversity of the youth who speak, as well as the reception of those who listen.

See also

  • community youth development
  • critical pedagogy
  • collaborative learning
  • Democratic Schools
  • youth participation
  • The Freechild Project
  • Take Children Seriously
  • National Youth Rights Association

External links

Homeschooling

Filed under: Education — @ 8:55 am

Homeschooling

Thomas Edison attended compulsory school for only three months, after which he was taught at home by his mother and a tutor.

Enlarge

Thomas Edison attended compulsory school for only three months, after which he was taught at home by his mother and a tutor.

Home education, also called homeschooling or home school, is an educational alternative in which children are educated at home by their parents, in contrast to the compulsory attendance which takes place in an institution with a campus such as a public school or private school. Home education methods are similar to those widely used before the popularization of compulsory attendance requirements in the 19th century. Before this time, the majority of education worldwide was provided at home by family and community members, with only the privileged attending privately-run schools or employing tutors, the only available alternatives at the time.

In modern times, although there were American families living overseas who were already homeschooling their children, the first parents known to homeschool within the United States were Tom and Mary Bergman of Utah, 1971. Unknown to each other at the time, the second known family was Charles and Virginia Birt Baker of Texas, 1972. Homeschooling was sometimes erroneously called unschooling, but the latter was a curriculum-free philosophy coined in 1977 by American educator John Holt in his alternative education magazine Growing Without Schooling. The terms homeschooling and home education also include instruction in the home by parents choosing to be under the supervision of correspondence schools, which are referred to as “umbrella schools” [example: Christian Liberty Academy].

In the United States, homeschooling is the focus of a substantial movement among parents who wish to provide their children with a custom or more complete education, which they feel is unattainable in most private schools or the government’s public schools. While many families in the U.S. are educating their children at home, the vast majority still utilize the institutional setting for their children. Despite its popularity some people have concerns about the recent renaissance of this traditional method of educating children.

Contents

History

The general historic foundations of home education originate with the informal education systems that existed in many parts of the world before the rise of publicly-run schools in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. For example, famous figures such as Thomas Edison, Abraham Lincoln and Woodrow Wilson (the only U.S. President to hold a Ph.D.) might be considered to have been home-educated as they were self-educated or had mentors or tutors growing up, but received little formal education.

In the United States, the “curriculum in a box”, or All-in-one curriculum, form of home education dates back to 1906, when the Calvert Day School of Baltimore, Maryland made such materials available through a downtown Baltimore bookstore and a National Geographic advertisement. Within five years, nearly 300 children were making use of materials from Calvert’s Home Instruction Department. In less than a century the materials had become the basis for lessons for more than 350,000 children annually in more than 90 countries.

Popularity

Australia & New Zealand

About 26,500 children in Australia & New Zealand are involved in home schooling.[1]

Canada

As of 2001, it was estimated that 80,000 children are educated at home in Canada[2]; however, that number continues to increase.

United Kingdom

An estimated 50,000 children are considered “home-educated” in the United Kingdom.[3]

United States

In the United States, homeschooling is the focus of a substantial movement among parents who wish to provide their children with a custom or more complete education, which they feel is unattainable in most private schools or the state governments’ public school systems. In many instances one motivation is to provide religious education along with education on traditional subjects; religious education would not be available in a public school setting, and the available private schools may be too expensive for the family to afford, or may be of a different faith than that of the family. Home schooling is also considered an excellent alternative by groups whose job necesitates frequent moves, such as military families. While a growing number of families in the U.S. are educating their children at home, the vast majority of families still utilize the institutional setting for their children.

In 2003 about 1.1 million children (up 29% from 850,000 in 1999) were home-educated on the United States[4]. A desire to provide religious or moral instruction, and a desire to provide a better learning environment are among the most common reasons for homeschooling. Other reasons include: more flexibility in adapting educational practices for children with learning disabilities or illnesses; allowing the introduction of more non-traditional studies, such as Latin and agriculture, focusing more on a child’s unique gifts, such as art or mathematics; and providing more hands-on methods of learning such as unschooling.

As educational choices become abundant through a vast array of educational products and services available, computers, and the internet, the idea of homeschooling in the U.S. is expanding in popularity and acceptance. Some state governments, like those in Alaska, California, Pennsylvania, Utah, and Kansas, sponsor home-education “virtual” charter schools and/or reimburse parents who purchase curricula approved by the state. [5][6]

Motivations

Individual motivations to home-educate, home education methods, and academic and social results of home education are varied, and are the source of vibrant debate. Proponents of this educational alternative invoke parental responsibility and the classical liberal arguments for personal freedom from government intrusion. Some proponents advocate that home education should be the dominant educational policy.

Most home education advocates are wary of the established educational institutions for various reasons. Some feel that they can more effectively tailor a curriculum to suit an individual student’s academic strengths and weaknesses, especially children who are gifted or have learning disabilities. Others are religious conservatives who see non-religious education as contrary to their moral or religious systems. Still others feel that the negative social pressures of schools, such as bullying, drugs, school violence, and other school-related problems, are detrimental to a child’s development. Many parents simply like the idea of teaching their own children rather than letting someone else do so.

Number and percentage of homeschooled students, by reason for homeschooling: 1999, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)

Enlarge

Number and percentage of homeschooled students, by reason for homeschooling: 1999, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)

In the United States, reasons for homeschooling vary; religious concerns are an important, though not overwhelming, factor. According to a 2003 U.S. Census survey, the parents of 33% of homeschooled children cited religion as a factor in their choice, 30% felt the regular school had a poor learning environment, 14% objected to what the school teaches, 11% felt their children weren’t being challenged at school, and 9% cited morality [7]. In 2003, the reasons most frequently reported by parents for homeschooling were: concerns about the school environment (85%); a desire to provide religious or moral instruction (72%); and dissatisfaction with academic instruction (68%)[8].

Options which make home education attractive to some families also include:

  • Allowing a longer exploratory play-oriented childhood, encouraging the development of rich imagination and pre-academic skills which can foster later academic success
  • Allowing each student to work at his or her own pace, enjoy family vacations, and integrate outside activities or current events into subjects they are studying
  • Incorporating religion, ethics, and character topics not included in most school curricula
  • Including non-traditional curricula and unusual subjects such as Latin and Greek
  • Giving extra weight to subjects of particular family interest such as art, music, or business
  • Adapting educational practices for children with learning disabilities or illnesses
  • Providing a legal option for families who wish to abstain from mandatory immunizations.
  • Providing consistency in education for families that travel or move frequently.

Methods

The Internet has made information more accessible than ever.

Enlarge

The Internet has made information more accessible than ever.

There is a wide variety of home education methods and materials. Many home education families base their work on a particular educational philosophy such as:

  • Classical education (including Trivium, Quadrivium)
  • Waldorf Education
  • Charlotte Mason education
  • Theory of multiple intelligences
  • Montessori method

Others use a broad combination of ideas or allow the child to develop their own motivation, through what is known as Unschooling.

Because home education laws vary widely according to individual government statutes, official curriculum requirements vary. [9]

Unit studies

Unit studies teach most subjects in the context of a central theme. For example, a unit study of Native Americans could combine age-appropriate lessons in: social studies, like how different tribes live now, and lived prior to colonization; art, such as making Native American clothing; history of Native Americans in the U.S.); reading from a special reading list; and the science of plants used by Native Americans. The following unit-study subject could change to some other broad topic of study.

Supporters say unit studies make excellent use of student time by combining several fields into one study time, and permit students to follow personal interests. Unit studies also permit children of different ages to study together. For example, in a Native American unit, a 10th-grade student might make a deer-skin coat for an art project, while a 1st-grade student might make construction-paper tipis.

Home educators often purchase unit-study guides that suggest materials, projects and shopping lists, and supplement them with specialized curricula for maths, and sometimes reading and writing.

Special materials

Special materials focus on skill-building. Individual subject materials usually consist of workbooks, sometimes with textbooks, and an instructional guide. Many specialized subjects are only available in this form. Special materials are frequently used for math and primary reading.

Critics say that some parents over-focus on skills while excluding social studies, science, art, history and other fields that help children learn their place in the world.

All-in-one curricula

“All-in-one” curricula, sometimes called “school in a box”, are comprehensive packages covering many subjects, usually an entire year’s worth. They contain all needed books and materials, including pencils and writing paper. Most such curricula were developed for isolated families who lack access to public schools, libraries and shops, or are overseas.

These materials typically recreate the school environment in the home, and are typically based on the same subject-area expectations as publicly-run schools, allowing an easy transition into school if desired. They are among the most expensive options for the home-educated, but are easy to use and require minimal preparation. The instructional guides are usually extensive, with step-by-step instructions. These programs may include standardized tests, and remote examinations to yield an accredited privately-run school diploma.

Student-paced learning

Similar to All-in-one curricula are learner paced curriculum packages. Often times called paces, these workbooks allow the student to progress at an individualized speed. They allow the student to master concepts before moving on to the next subject, instead of being held back by the speed of the teacher and other students or rushing forward for the same reasons. Prices vary widely depending upon the publisher.

Community resources

Home educators take advantage of educational programs at museums, community centers, athletic clubs, after-school programs, churches, science preserves, parks, and other community resources. Secondary school level students often take classes at community colleges, which typically have open admission policies.

Eclectic curricula

The majority of today’s home-educated use an eclectic mix of materials. For instance, they might use a pre-designed program for language, arts or mathematics, and fill in history with reading and field trips, art with classes at a community center, science through a homeschool science club, physical education with membership in local sports teams, and so on.

Unschooling

Unschooling is an area in which students are not directly instructed but encouraged to learn through exploring their interests. Also known as interest-led or child-led learning, unschooling attempts to provide opportunities with games and real life problems where a child will learn without coercion. An unschooled child may choose to use texts or classroom instruction, but it is never considered central to education.

Advocates for unschooling claim that children learn best by learning from doing. A child may learn reading and math skills from playing card games, better spelling and other writing skills because he’s inspired to write a science fiction story for publication, or local history by following a zoning or historical-status dispute.

Social development

A common concern voiced about home-educated children is they lack the social interaction with peers that a school environment provides. Many home-education families address these concerns by joining numerous organizations, including home-education cooperatives, independent study programs and specialized enrichment groups for physical education, art, music, and debate. Most are also active in community groups. Home-educated children generally socialize with other children the same way that school children do: outside of school, via personal visits and through sports teams, clubs, and religious groups.

Most home education proponents have argued that their alternative actually enhances the student’s social development. They argue that the school years are the only time in a person’s life that he or she will be artificially segregated into chronologically-determined groups. These advocates assert that home-educated children have a more normal interaction with persons across the age spectrum. This, in turn, results in more influence on the child from adults, and less from other children, leading to more mature young citizens.

Social concerns

Opponents of home education offer criticisms concerning socialization, pointing out that not all home-education families participate sufficiently in community activities. Some of the concerns offered include:

  • Interaction with different social groups is essential to learning to live in society; a common criticism is that home-schoolers’ “interaction” is solely with other home-schooled children from like-minded families.
  • Schools are a unique environment that provide students with necessary social networking skills that help them succeed in the workplace and in the politics of business. Real life includes school as well.
  • Home-educated children tend to live in an insulated world where they aren’t exposed to a variety of ideas, which can impede personal growth and independence later in life.
  • If children are insulated from unpleasant social situations, then they will be left unprepared when they are inevitably left to make their own way in the world. Children should be allowed to live and learn from their mistakes rather than sheltered from reality.

Some people oppose home education because they fear that children will be exposed to an extremely narrow set of view-points and will lack the broad range of experiences gained through interaction in a larger group setting.

Cost

Home education may have a financial impact on families. In addition to purchasing school supplies and curriculum materials, parents often cut back or refrain from employment outside the home in order to supervise the child’s education. This may have long-term career consequences in addition to the more immediate concerns of reduced family income. However, many such parents say that one unique benefit is the additional time they get to spend with their children. Further, in most jurisdictions the family still must pay property taxes to the local district (even if school vouchers are offered they are rarely available to homeschooling families).

Conversely, families may see a financial benefit. Families may save unspent money on the costs of tuition outside the home, such as: school fees; levies; uniforms; compulsory books and extra curricular activities, such as school sports teams or clubs.

Of course home education can be expensive if a full curriculum is purchased and many costly activities are attended. It can also be very inexpensive by using free resources, taking advantage of free facilities, such as public libraries, art galleries, parks, and gardens, and resources available on the Internet.

Public opinion

Opposition to home education comes from varied sources, including organizations of teachers and school districts. One example is the National Education Association, a teachers’ union, which is the largest labor union in the United States. They are on record as opposing homeschooling outright; though, in recent years they have not been as outspoken in this opposition. Opponents state concerns falling into several broad categories, including: academic quality and completeness; reduced government money for the publicly-run schools; socialization of children with peers of different ethnic and religious backgrounds; and fear of religious or social extremism. Gallup polls of American voters have shown a significant change in attitude in the last twenty years, from 73% opposed to home education in 1985 to 54% opposed in 2001 [10].

Opponents view home-educating parents as sheltering their children and denying them opportunities that are their children’s right, reducing the amount of government funds publicly-run schools would receive if more children were attending the publicly-run school, and providing an unfair advantage to home-educated children over students whose parents lack the time or money for home education.

Two recent studies by the Home School Legal Defense Association, a home education advocacy group in the United States, dispute the claim that the academic quality of home education programs is substandard.[11][12]

Legality

Home education exists legally in many parts of the world. Countries with the most prevalent home education movements include the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Some countries have highly regulated home education programs which are actually an extension of the compulsory school system, while others have outlawed it entirely. In many other countries, while not restricted by law, home education is not socially acceptable and, therefore, virtually non-existent.

In many countries where home education does not exist legally, underground movements flourish where children are kept out of the compulsory school system and educated at, sometimes, considerable risk. Still, in other countries, while the practice is illegal, the governments do not have the resources to police and prosecute offenders and, as such, it takes place largely in the open.

Home education in the United States is governed by each individual state and therefore regulations vary greatly from one state to another.

See also: Legality of homeschooling in the United States

Results

Academic findings

The academic effectiveness of home education is largely a settled issue. Numerous studies have confirmed the academic integrity of home education programs, demonstrating that on average, home-educated students outperform their publicly-run school peers by 30 to 37 percentile points across all subjects. Moreover, the performance gaps between minorities and gender that plague publicly-run schools are virtually non-existent amongst home-educated students.[13]

Some critics argue that while home-educated students generally do extremely well on standardized tests[14], such students are a self-selected group whose parents care strongly about their education and would also do well in a conventional school environment.

Some opponents argue that parents with little training in education are less effective in teaching. However, some studies do indicate that parental income and education level affect home-educated student performance on standardized tests very little.

Home-educated student curricula often include many subjects not included in traditional curricula. Some colleges find this an advantage in creating a more academically diverse student body, and proponents argue this creates a more well-rounded and self-sufficient adult. Increasingly, colleges are recruiting home-educated students; many colleges accept equivalency diplomas as well as parent statements and portfolios of student work as admission criteria; others also require SATs or other standardized tests. Opponents argue that home education curricula often excludes critical subjects and isolates the student from the rest of society, or presents them with ideological world views, especially religious ones. [citation needed]

The results of home education with gifted and learning-disabled children have not been as thoroughly studied.

Social findings

In 2003, the National Home Education Research Institute (NHERI) conducted a survey of over 7,300 U.S. adults who had been home-educated (over 5,000 for more than seven years). Their findings included:

  • Home-educated graduates are active and involved in their communities. 71% participate in an ongoing community service activity, like coaching a sports team, volunteering at a school, or working with a church or neighborhood association, compared with 37% of U.S. adults of similar ages from a traditional education background.
  • Home-educated graduates are more involved in civic affairs and vote in much higher percentages than their peers. For example, 76% of surveyed between the ages of 18 and 24 voted within the last five years, compared with only 29% of the relevant U.S. population. The numbers of home-educated graduates who vote are even greater in older age groups, with voting levels not falling below 95%, compared with a high of 53% for the corresponding U.S. populace.
  • Of those adults who were home-educated, 58.9% report that they are “very happy” with life (compared with 27.6% for the general U.S. population). Moreover, 73.2% of homeschooled adults find life “exciting”, compared with 47.3% of the general population.[15]

The Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), a U.S. government agengy, has published multiple articles on home education. Here are excerpts from one which examined several studies on home-educated children socialization:

According to the findings, children who were educated at home “gained the necessary skills, knowledge, and attitudes needed to function in society…at a rate similar to that of conventionally schooled children.

and;

The researcher found no difference in the self concept of children in the two groups, and maintains that “insofar as self concept is a reflector of socialization, it would appear that few home-schooled children are socially deprived, and that there may be sufficient evidence to indicate that some home-schooled children have a higher self concept than conventionally schooled children.” [16]

Proponents argue further that the social environment of traditional schools:

  • strongly inhibits individuality and creativity,
  • follows the standards set by the slowest students,
  • involves bullying, recreational drug use, early sexuality, defiance, criminality, materialism, and eating disorders.

and that socialization in the wider community:

  • leads them to see adults, rather than peers, as role models,
  • better prepares them for real life,
  • encourages them to be more involved in youth, church, and sports organizations,
  • helps them develop an independent understanding of themselves and their role in the world, with the freedom to reject or approve conventional values without the risk of ridicule,
  • teaches children to deal with a variety of situations and people,
  • still provides for interaction with conventionally-educated children after school hours in their neighbourhood and in other after-school activities.

Notable home-educated individuals

  • Thomas Edison, United States, scientist and inventor
  • Andrew Wyeth, United States, Artist
  • Alexander Graham Bell, Scotland, Inventor (Telephone, Hydrofoil)
  • Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Germany, theologian, Hitler assassination conspirator
  • Aaron Carter, United States, Singer
  • Dakota Fanning, United States, actress
  • Lynx and Lamb Gaede, United States, racialist musicians
  • Pierre-Gilles de Gennes, France, physicist
  • Hilary Duff, United States, Actress/Singer
  • Charles Evans Hughes, United States, Governor of New York, United States Secretary of State, and Chief Justice of the United States
  • Jon, Peter, and Dann Hume, New Zealand, musicians
  • Brooke Hogan, United States, Singer
  • Ruth Lawrence, Israel/United Kingdom/United States, mathematician
  • General Douglas MacArthur, United States, General/WW2 Hero
  • Bode Miller, United States, champion skier
  • The Moffatts, Canada, Band
  • Evelyn De Morgan, United Kingdom, artist
  • Clara Muhammad, United States, Nation of Islam leader
  • Frankie Muniz, United States, Actor
  • Chauntelle, Sherri, Weston, Stacy and Garron DuPree, United States, musicians
  • Christopher Paolini, United States, author
  • Rosa Parks, United States, civil rights activist
  • Susan La Flesche Picotte, United States, first American Indian woman physician
  • John T. Plecnik, United States, syndicated columnist
  • Emerson Spartz, United States, internet entrepreneur
  • Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, Russia, rocket scientist and pioneer of cosmonautics
  • Roman Vishniac, Russia/United States, photographer, biologist, and polyglot
  • Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz, Poland, author and artist
  • Sho Yano, United States, child prodigy
  • Woodrow Wilson, United States, the only United States President to hold a Ph.D.
  • George Washington, United States, First United States President
  • Abraham Lincoln, United States, President during American Civil War

Quotes

Opinions relevant to education are those of the authors of the quotes:

  • “The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled” - Plutarch (45-125 A.D.)
  • “What we want to see is the child in pursuit of knowledge, not knowledge in pursuit of the child” - George Bernard Shaw (1856-1950)
  • “Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education” Bertrand Russell (1872 – 1970)
  • “When you make the finding yourself, even if you are the last person on earth to see the light, you will never forget it” - Carl Sagan (1934-1996)
  • “To find yourself, think for yourself” - Socrates (469-399 BC)
  • “The authority of those who teach is often an obstacle to those who want to learn” - Cicero (106-43 BC)
  • “Spoon feeding in the long run teaches us nothing but the shape of the spoon” - E. M. Forster (1879-1970)
  • “Imagination is more important than knowledge. Knowledge is limited. Imagination encircles the world” - Albert Einstein (1879-1955)*”Education is what remains after one has forgotten everything learnt in school” - Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
  • “It is nothing short of a miracle that modern methods of instruction have not entirely strangled the holy curiosity of enquiry” - Albert Einstein (1879-1955)

See also

  • Accelerated Christian Education
  • Attachment parenting
  • Catherine Baker
  • Deschooling
  • Educational philosophies
  • The Education of Henry Adams
  • John Taylor Gatto
  • General Educational Development (GED)
  • Growing Without Schooling
  • Proactive Academics
  • School choice
  • Washington Homeschool Organization
  • Work at home parent

References

  • “Mary Pride’s Complete Guide to Getting Started in Homeschooling” by Mary Pride ISBN 0736909184 Fifth edition of first mass-market book to describe and review the entire homeschool movement and market
  • Teach Your Own by John Holt and Patrick Farenga
  • A Thomas Jefferson Education by Oliver DeMille
  • Homeschooling: Take a Deep Breath—You Can Do This! by Terrie Lynn Bittner, ISBN 0972807152
  • The Well-Trained Mind by Susan Wise Bauer and Jessie Wise
  • The Teenage Liberation Handbook by Grace Llewellyn
  • The Homeschooling Handbook by Mary Griffith
  • Family Matters: Why Homeschooling Makes Sense by David Guterson
  • You Are Your Child’s First Teacher by Rahima Baldwin Dancy
  • The Complete Home Learning Sourcebook by Rebecca Rupp
  • The Homeschool Source Book by Donn Reed
  • The extract from the Education Act is Crown Copyright, 1996. Reproduced from Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, United Kingdom. The Education Act is available in printed form, ISBN 0105456969

External links

USA / UK / France / New Zealand

General

Research

Legalities

UK

France

  • IndigoExtra - provides information and links on home education in Europe, with a focus on France
  • Les Enfants d’Abord - A home-education organisation with information in English and French.

New Zealand

  • Home Education Foundation - The Home Education Foundation is a charitable trust established to encourage parents to take up the option of educating their children at home and to support them in their task.

Adult high school

Filed under: Education — @ 8:55 am

Adult high school

An adult high school is a high school facility designed for adult education. It is intended primarily for adults who have not completed high school to continue their education in a facility which offers child care for single parents, special integration programs for immigrants, career counseling and other programs and services geared toward the special needs of adult students.

A number of cities in the United States and Canada have dedicated adult high school facilities. In most other cities, adults returning to high school attend regular high schools or community colleges. Some adult high schools operate within regular high schools during off-hours.

Some adult high schools may also offer general interest programs such as computer skills upgrading or other continuing education courses.

See also

Volkshochschule

Alternative education

Filed under: Education — @ 8:55 am

Alternative education

This article is about alternatives to traditional education. For a school for “at-risk” and special education, see Alternative school.
Great Neck Village School, an alternative high school in Great Neck, New York, USA

Enlarge

Great Neck Village School, an alternative high school in Great Neck, New York, USA

Alternative education, also known as non-traditional education or educational alternative, describes a number of approaches to teaching and learning other than traditional publicly- or privately-run schools. These approaches can be applied to all students of all ages, from infancy to adulthood, and all levels of education.

Educational alternatives are often the result of education reform and are rooted in various philosophies that are fundamentally different from those of mainstream compulsory education. While some have strong political, scholarly, or philosophical orientations, others are more informal associations of teachers and students somehow dissatisfied with certain aspects of mainstream education.

Educational alternatives, which include charter schools, alternative schools, independent schools, and home-based learning vary widely, but emphasize the value of small class size, close relationships between students and teachers, and a sense of community.

For some, especially in the United States, the term alternative refers to educational settings for “at-risk” youth, as well as those in need of special education, rather than educational alternatives for all students. Other words used in place of alternative by many educational professionals include non-traditional, non-conventional, or non-standardized, although these terms are used somewhat less frequently and sometimes have negative connotations as well as multiple meanings. Within the field of educational alternatives, words such as authentic, holistic, and progressive are frequently used as well, however, these words each have different meanings which are more specific or more ambiguous than simply alternative.

Contents

Overview

Over the 200-year course of compulsory education, various widely-scattered groups of critics have suggested that the education of young people should involve much more than simply molding them into future workers or citizens. The Swiss humanitarian Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi, the American transcendentalists Amos Bronson Alcott, Ralph Waldo Emerson, and Henry David Thoreau, the founders of progressive education John Dewey and Francis Parker, and educational pioneers such as Maria Montessori and Rudolf Steiner, among others, all insisted that education should be understood as the art of cultivating the moral, emotional, physical, psychological, and spiritual aspects of the developing child.

More recently, social critics such as John Caldwell Holt, Paul Goodman, and Ivan Illich have examined education from more individualist, anarchist, and libertarian perspectives, that is, critiques of the ways that they feel conventional education subverts democracy by molding young people’s understandings. Other writers, from the revolutionary Paulo Freire to American educators like Herbert Kohl and Jonathan Kozol, have criticized mainstream Western education from the viewpoint of their varied left-liberal and radical politics.

Another quality that distinguishes educational alternatives from their traditional counterparts is their diversity. Unlike traditional privately-run and publicly-run schools which are remarkably similar in many aspects to one another, most alternatives do not subscribe to a “one model fits all” approach. Each educational alternative attempts to create and maintain its own methods and approaches to learning and teaching. Practitioners aspire to realize that there are many ways of conceiving and understanding the needs of the whole child in balance with the needs of the community and society at large. Thus, each alternative approach is founded upon, sometimes drastically, different beliefs about what it means to live, learn, and grow in today’s society.

One aspect that distinguishes educational alternatives from each other is the curricula taught within their respective settings. Across these alternatives, we find that traditional subjects such as reading, writing, and mathematics are not always taught separately but integrated into the overall learning experience. Other subjects like environmental education, ecology, or spirituality, which are often not found in more traditional school curricula, emerge from the interests of learners and teachers in a more open-ended learning community. For the most part, however, subject matter is only indirectly related to the root philosophies and educational approaches utilized in many alternative education systems. Often alternative approaches to education will vary considerably within a single type of alternative from one cultural or geographic setting to another.

Modern forms

A wide variety of educational alternatives exist at the elementary, secondary, and tertiary levels of education. These generally fall into four major categories: school choice, alternative school, independent school, and home-based education. These general categories can be further broken down into more specific practices and methodologies.

School choice

Main article: School choice

The public school options include entirely separate schools in their own settings as well as classes, programs, and even semi-autonomous “schools within schools.” Public school choice options are open to all students in their communities, though some have waiting lists. Among these are charter schools, combining private initiatives and state funding; and magnet schools, which attract students to particular themes, such as performing arts.

Alternative school

Main article: Alternative school

Special needs schools, sometimes referred to as alternative schools are geared towards students with special needs as well as “at-risk” students who are having difficulty with school, including potential drop-outs, pregnant teens, returning students.

See also: Special education

Independent school

Main article: Independent school

Independent, or private, schools have more flexibility in staff selection and educational approach. The most plentiful of these are Montessori schools, in one form or another, most of which are private, but an increasing number are public, Waldorf schools (sometimes called Steiner schools because they are based on the teachings of Rudolf Steiner), Friends schools, and various other independent schools. These include democratic, or free schools such as Summerhill School and Sudbury Valley School, Krishnamurti schools, open classroom schools, those based on experiential education, as well as schools which teach using international curriculum such as the International Baccalaureate and Round Square schools. The majority of independent schools offer at least partial scholarships.

See also: List of Friends Schools, List of Sudbury Schools, and List of Waldorf Schools

Home-based education

Main article: Homeschooling

Families who seek alternatives based on educational, philosophical, or religious reasons, or if there appears to be no nearby educational alternative can decide to have home-based education. Some call themselves unschoolers, for they follow an approach based on interest, rather than a set curriculum. Others enroll in umbrella schools which provide a curriculum to follow. Many choose this alternative for religious-based reasons, but practitioners of home-based education are of all backgrounds and philosophies.

Other

There are also some interesting grey areas. For instance, home-based educators have combined to create resource centers where they meet as often as four days a week, but their members are all home-based. In some states publicly-run school districts have set up programs for homeschoolers whereby they are considered enrolled, and have access to school resources and facilities.

Also, many traditional schools have incorporated methods which might be considered alternative into their general approach, so the line between alternative and mainstream education is continually becoming more blurred.

Internationally

Canada

In Canada, some privately-run schools receive government school funding.

Toronto

In Toronto the alternative movement has been adopted and functions within the framework of the Toronto District School Board. An example, is Mountview Alternative School which shares space with the much larger Keele Elementary School in Toronto’s High Park-Junction. Another example is the Triangle Program, Canada’s only high school program designed especially for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender students.

See also

  • Autodidacticism

Further reading

  • Korn, Claire V. (1991). Alternative American Schools: Ideals in Action, Ithaca, New York: SUNY Press.
  • Trickett, Edison J. (1991). Living an Idea: Empowerment and the Evolution of an Alternative High School, University of Maryland: Brookline Books.

Resources

External links

Alternative high school

Filed under: Education — @ 8:55 am

Alternative high school

Great Neck Village School, an alternative high school in Great Neck, New York in the United States

Enlarge

Great Neck Village School, an alternative high school in Great Neck, New York in the United States

For the Calgary school with this name see Alternative High School (Calgary)

An alternative high school provides different educational opportunities to students who have dropped out or are at-risk of failing within the traditional high school setting.(disputed ) In education, the phrase alternative school usually refers to a school based on a non-traditional, new, or non-standard educational philosophy. A wide range of philosophies and teaching methods are offered by alternative schools; some have strong political, scholarly, or philosophical orientations, while others are more ad-hoc assemblies of teachers and students dissatisfied with some aspect of mainstream education. In many instances the alternative schools tend to be smaller than regular schools and teachers and students are closer to each other i.e. calling teachers by their first names. They also usually work together as a community unlike a regular school. Ideally, alternative schools are aimed to gifted students but they may accept students that may not be served well by traditional public schools in their communities (such as pregnant teens or teen parents, drop-outs, and other at-risk populations) or those with special educational needs.

See also

  • Alternative school
  • Alternative high schools
  • Homeschooling

Alternative school

Filed under: Education — @ 8:55 am

Alternative school

This article is about a school for “at-risk” and special education. For alternatives to traditional education, see Alternative education.

An alternative school, sometimes referred to as a minischool, special-needs school, or remedial school, is an educational alternative geared toward students in need of special education, as well as “at-risk” students who are having other difficulties in a traditional school setting, including potential drop-outs, pregnant teens, and returning students. These schools generally offer smaller class sizes with lower teacher-to-student ratios, special curricula, and a more flexible program of study than a traditional school.

Generally an alternative school serves as an extension to a larger traditional privately- or publicly-run primary or secondary school, although similar programs exist in higher education settings that serve adults returning to school. They generally function as stand-alone schools, or in the case of minischools, as a “school within a school”, where they physically operate within the walls of the larger school.

Sometimes, particularly in the United States, the phrase alternative school can refer to a school which practices alternative education. This is a much broader use of the term, covering all forms of non-traditional educational methods and philosophies, including school choice, independent school, homeschooling, and alternative school as described in this article.

Purpose

The major goal of an alternative school is to provide opportunities for the students not succeeding in the traditional classroom setting to obtain academic credit, career exploration activities, vocational work experience, and extended teacher/peer support in an alternative setting where the unltimate goal is that of obtaining a diploma. This is done through various methods aimed at helping and encouraging at-risk students. Many of the methods utilized attempt to:

  • Reduce the alienation and improve the self-concept of at-risk students
  • Provide at-risk students with increased access to desirable social roles
  • Increase community and parental participation in the education of at-risk students
  • Provide a flexible and integrated academic and vocationally oriented curriculum which emphasizes the importance of school in preparing for later life
  • Provide students with a success-oriented program to obtain academic and employability skills in a school environment
  • Provide a competency-based, self-paced program with clear quantifiable objectives. Instruction will be provided in a variety of ways best suited to the individual student’s needs
  • Foster within students the responsibility for their own learning and the expectation that they will take an active role in setting their own goals

Methods

Alternative school programs generally strive to keep their student/teacher ratio low, usually ten to one or less, allowing for more individualized and personalized instruction. School staffs have a great deal of autonomy in developing curriculum and establishing rules. Teachers must also provide an extended role in dealing with the whole child and his/her problems. The alternative site that is generally apart from and different than the regular school building with the intent of fostering a positive environment. By developing a feeling of community and a sense of belonging, students find it easier to commit to a new set of rules, expectations and standards of behavior.

Academic and vocationally oriented education programs are generally provided through an individualized, student-centered approach. These programs try be attentive to the needs of a career-oriented curriculum and will be sensitive to the variety of learning styles among students. Participants learn through various means, like within classrooms, in small groups, in vocational activities, in community-based outreach programs, and through internships. The environment created for each student aims to be positive, caring, and adapted to individual needs. Alternative school programs stress individualized academic education, career development, and personal growth.

Alternative schools will work with each student to assess academic, career, and personal needs in order to develop an individualized learning plan. Emphasis is generally placed on helping students develop self-discipline and responsibility. A fundamental belief of many alternative schools is that all students are of value, and they need guidance to find and develop the positive qualities they possess, despite that many will have histories of failure in the ‘traditional’ educational system.

See also

  • Gifted education
  • Special education

Amos Bronson Alcott

Filed under: Education — @ 8:55 am

Amos Bronson Alcott

A. Bronson Alcott

Enlarge

A. Bronson Alcott

Amos Bronson Alcott (November 29, 1799 - March 4, 1888) was an American teacher and writer. He is remembered for founding a short-lived and unconventional school as well as a utopian community known as “Fruitlands”, and for his association with Transcendentalism.

Alcott was born on Spindle Hill in the town of Wolcott, New Haven County, Connecticut. His father, Joseph Chatfield Alcox, was a farmer and mechanic whose ancestors, then bearing the name of Alcocke, had settled in eastern Massachusetts in colonial days. The son adopted the spelling “Alcott” in his early youth.

Self-educated and early thrown upon his own resources, he began in 1814 to earn his living by working in a clock factory in Plymouth, Connecticut, and for many years after 1815 he peddled books and merchandise, chiefly in the southern states. He began teaching in Bristol, Connecticut in 1823, and subsequently conducted schools in Cheshire, Connecticut, in 1825-1827, again in Bristol in 1827-1828, in Boston, Massachusetts in 1828-1830, in Germantown, now part of Philadelphia, in 1831-1833, and in Philadelphia in 1833. As a young teacher he was most convinced by the educational philosophy of the Swiss pedagogue Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi.

In 1830 he married Abby May, the sister of Samuel J. May (1797-1871), the reformer and abolitionist. Alcott himself was a Garrisonian abolitionist, and pioneered the strategy of tax resistance to slavery which Thoreau made famous in Civil Disobedience. Alcott publicly debated with Thoreau the use of force and passive resistance to slavery; along with Thoreau he was among the financial and moral supporters of John Brown and occasionally helped fugitive slaves escape on the Underground Railroad.

In 1834 he opened the Temple School in Boston, which became famous because of his original methods. Alcott’s plan was to develop self-instruction on the basis of self-analysis, with an emphasis on conversation rather than the lecture and drill which were prevalent in U.S. classrooms of the time. The subject matter was often the Gospels, religious and moral principles; some of the school’s conversations were published in Alcott’s Conversations with Children on the Gospels. Alcott refused corporal punishment as a means of disciplining his students; instead, he offered his own hand for an offending student to strike, saying that any failing was the teacher’s responsibility. The shame and guilt this method induced, he believed, was far superior to the fear instilled by corporal punishment. As assistants in the school Alcott had two of nineteenth-century America’s most talented women writers, Elizabeth Palmer Peabody (who published A Record of Mr. Alcott’s School in 1835) and Margaret Fuller; as students he had the children of the Boston intellectual classes, including Josiah Quincy, grandson of the president of Harvard. Alcott’s methods were not well received; many in the church found his conversations on the Gospels close to blasphemous, and many in the public found his disciplinary measures ridiculous. The school was denounced in the press and rejected by most public opinion, and was not pecuniarily successful as the controversy caused many parents to remove their students. Finally Alcott alienated many of the remaining parents by admitting an African American child whom he then refused to expel from his classes. In 1839 the school was closed, although Alcott had won the affection of many of his pupils. His pedagogy was a forerunner of progressive and democratic schooling.

The Wayside, home in turn to the Alcott family, Nathaniel Hawthorne, and Margaret Sidney.

Enlarge

The Wayside, home in turn to the Alcott family, Nathaniel Hawthorne, and Margaret Sidney.

In 1840 Alcott removed to Concord, Massachusetts. After a visit to England, in 1842, he started with two English associates, Charles Lane and Henry C. Wright, at “Fruitlands”, in the town of Harvard, Massachusetts, a utopian socialist experiment in farm living and nature meditation as tending to develop the best powers of body and soul. The experiment quickly collapsed, and Alcott returned in 1844 to his Concord home “Hillside” (later renamed “The Wayside” by Hawthorne) near that of Ralph Waldo Emerson. Alcott removed to Boston four years later, and again back to Concord after 1857.

He spoke, as opportunity offered, before the “lyceums” then common in various parts of the United States, or addressed groups of hearers as they invited him. These “conversations” as he called them, were more or less informal talks on a great range of topics, spiritual, aesthetic and practical, in which he emphasized the ideas of the school of American Transcendentalists led by Emerson, who was always his supporter and discreet admirer. He dwelt upon the illumination of the mind and soul by direct communion with the Creative Spirit; upon the spiritual and poetic monitions of external nature; and upon the benefit to man of a serene mood and a simple way of life.

Alcott’s philosophical teaching was, and is still, often thought inconsistent, hazy or abrupt. But though he formulated no system of philosophy, and seemed to show the influence now of Plato, now of Kant, or of German thought as filtered through the brain of Coleridge, he was, like Emerson, steadily optimistic, idealistic, and individualistic. The teachings of Dr. William Ellery Channing a little before had laid the groundwork for the work of most of the Concord Transcendentalists and contributors to The Dial, of whom Alcott was one.

In his last years, his daughter, the writer Louisa May Alcott, provided for him. Alcott was gratified at being able to become the nominal, and at times the actual, head of a Concord “Summer School of Philosophy and Literature”, which had its first session in 1879, and in which, in a building next to his house, listeners were addressed during a part of several successive summers on many themes in philosophy, religion and letters.

Alcott’s published books, all from late in his life, included Tablets (1868), Concord Days (1872), and Sonnets and Canzonets (1882). Earlier he had written a series of Orphic Sayings which were published in The Dial as examples of Transcendentalist thought. The sayings, though called oracular, were considered sloppy, or vague by contemporary commentators as well as twentieth-century ones. He left a large collection of personal jottings and memorabilia, most of which remain unpublished. He died in Boston on 4 March 1888.

References

  • Alcott, Amos Bronson. Conversations with Children on the Gospels.
  • Geraldine Brooks. “Orpheus at the Plough.” The New Yorker, January 10, 2005, pp. 58-65. (The New Yorker article is reproduced on author’s website)

This article incorporates text from the Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition, a publication now in the public domain.

Biology

Filed under: Chemistry Terms — @ 8:55 am

Biology

   
Portal:Biology
Biology Portal

Biology is a branch of science, dealing with the study of life. It is concerned with the characteristics, classification, and behaviors of organisms, how species come into existence, and the interactions they have with each other and with the environment. Biology encompasses a broad spectrum of academic fields that are often viewed as independent disciplines. However, together they address phenomena related to living organisms (biological phenomena) over a wide range of scales, from biochemistry to ecology.

Escherichia coli Tree fern
Goliath beetle Gazelle
Biology studies the variety of life (clockwise from top-left) E. coli, tree fern, gazelle, Goliath beetle

At the organism level, biology has explained phenomena such as birth, growth, ageing, death and decay of living organisms, similarities between the offsprings and parents (heredity) and flowering of plants have puzzled humanity ever since antiquity. Other phenomena, such as lactation, metamorphosis, egg-hatching, healing, and tropism have been addressed. On a wider scale of time and space, biologists have studied domestication of animals and plants, the wide variety of living organisms (biodiversity), changes in living organisms through ages (evolution), extinction, speciation, social behaviour among animals, etc.

While botany encompasses the study of plants, zoology is the branch of science that is concerned about the study of animals and anthropology is the branch of biology to study human beings. However, at the molecular scale, life is studied in the disciplines of molecular biology, biochemistry, and molecular genetics. At the next level of the cell, it is studied in cell biology, and at multicellular scales, it is examined in physiology, anatomy, and histology. Developmental biology studies life at the level of an individual organism’s development or ontogeny. Moving up the scale towards more than one organism, genetics considers how heredity works between parent and offspring. Ethology considers group behavior of more than one individual. Population genetics looks at the level of an entire population, and systematics considers the multi-species scale of lineages. Interdependent populations and their habitats are examined in ecology and evolutionary biology. A speculative new field is astrobiology (or xenobiology), which examines the possibility of life beyond the Earth.

Contents

Principles of biology

Unlike physics, biology does not usually describe systems in terms of objects which obey immutable physical laws described by mathematics. Nevertheless, the biological sciences are characterized and unified by several major underlying principles and concepts: universality, evolution, diversity, continuity, genetics, homeostasis, and interactions.

Universality: Biochemistry, cells, and the genetic code

Schematic representation of DNA, the primary genetic material.

Enlarge

Schematic representation of DNA, the primary genetic material.

Main article: Life

The most salient example of biological universality is that all living things share a common carbon-based biochemistry and in particular pass on their characteristics via genetic material, which is based on nucleic acids such as DNA and which uses a common genetic code with only minor variations.

Another universal principle is that all organisms (that is, all forms of life on Earth except for viruses) are made of cells. Similarly, all organisms share common developmental processes. For example, in most metazoan organisms, the basic stages of early embryonic development share similar morphological characteristics and include similar genes.

Evolution: The central principle of biology

Main article: Evolution

The central organizing concept in biology is that all life has a common origin and has changed and developed through the process of evolution (see Common descent). This has led to the striking similarity of units and processes discussed in the previous section. Charles Darwin established evolution as a viable theory by articulating its driving force, natural selection (Alfred Russell Wallace is recognized as the co-discoverer of this concept). Genetic drift was embraced as an additional mechanism of evolutionary development in the modern synthesis of the theory.

The evolutionary history of a species— which describes the characteristics of the various species from which it descended— together with its genealogical relationship to every other species is called its phylogeny. Widely varied approaches to biology generate information about phylogeny. These include the comparisons of DNA sequences conducted within molecular biology or genomics, and comparisons of fossils or other records of ancient organisms in paleontology. Biologists organize and analyze evolutionary relationships through various methods, including phylogenetics, phenetics, and cladistics (The major events in the evolution of life, as biologists currently understand them, are summarized on this evolutionary timeline).

Diversity: The variety of living organisms

A phylogenetic tree of all living things, based on rRNA gene data, showing the separation of the three domains bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes as described initially by Carl Woese.  Trees constructed with other genes are generally similar, although they may place some early-branching groups very differently, presumably owing to rapid rRNA evolution.  The exact relationships of the three domains are still being debated.

Enlarge

A phylogenetic tree of all living things, based on rRNA gene data, showing the separation of the three domains bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes as described initially by Carl Woese. Trees constructed with other genes are generally similar, although they may place some early-branching groups very differently, presumably owing to rapid rRNA evolution. The exact relationships of the three domains are still being debated.

Despite its underlying unity, life exhibits an astonishingly wide diversity in morphology, behavior, and life histories. In order to grapple with this diversity, biologists attempt to classify all living things. Scientific classification seeks to reflect the evolutionary trees (phylogenetic trees) of the organism being classified. Classification is the province of the disciplines of systematics and taxonomy. Taxonomy places organisms in groups called taxa, while systematics seeks to define their relationships with each other. This clasification technique has evolved to reflect advances in cladistics and genetics, shifting the focus from physical similarities and shared characteristics to phylogenetics.

Traditionally, living things have been divided into five kingdoms:

Monera — Protista — Fungi — Plantae — Animalia

However, many scientists now consider this five-kingdom system to be outdated. Modern alternative classification systems generally begin with the three-domain system:

Archaea (originally Archaebacteria) — Bacteria (originally Eubacteria) — Eukaryota

These domains reflect whether the cells have nuclei or not, as well as differences in the cell exteriors.

Further, each kingdom is broken down continuously until each species is separately classified. The order is 1)Kingdom, 2)Phylum, 3)Class, 4)Order, 5)Family, 6)Genus, 7)Species. The scientific name of an organism is obtained from its Genus and Species. For example, humans would be listed as Homo sapien. Homo would be the Genus and Sapien is the species. Whenever writing the scientific name of an organism it is proper to capitalize the first letter in the genus and all of the species is lowercase; in addition the entire term would be put in italics. The term used for classification is called Taxonomy.

There is also a series of intracellular parasites that are progressively “less alive” in terms of metabolic activity:

Viruses — Viroids — Prions

Continuity: The common descent of life

Main article: Common descent

Up into the 19th century, it was commonly believed that life forms could appear spontaneously under certain conditions (see abiogenesis). This misconception was challenged by William Harvey’s diction that “all life [is] from [an] egg” (from the Latin “Omne vivum ex ovo”), a foundational concept of modern biology. It simply means that there is an unbroken continuity of life from its initial origin to the present time.

A group of organisms is said to share a common descent if they share a common ancestor. All organisms on the Earth have been and are descended from a common ancestor or an ancestral gene pool. This last universal common ancestor of all organisms is believed to have appeared about 3.5 billion years ago. Biologists generally regard the universality of the genetic code as definitive evidence i